Ayn Rand and Conservative Politics
78Ayn Rand and Followers
Conservatives Follow Atheism
If you claim to be a Christian and you follow the philosophy of Ayn Rand, this is for you and it is a challenge, can you justify following an atheist philosophy and still be a Christian?
Weigh these words from the Bible next to the words from Ayn Rand and justify your so-called Christianity
Matthew 25:41-45
41 “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.
44 “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’
45 ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’
Ayn Rand, prominent Atheist and author of Atlas Shrugged and Fountainhead is the cultural goddess of the political right. A partial list of the adherents of Ayn Rand’s philosophy includes Rush Limbaugh, Paul Ryan, Rand Paul, Ron Paul, Jim Jordan, Sean Hannity, Alan Greenspan, Steve Moore, John Campbell, Clarence Thomas and many others.
Rep. John Campbell (R-Calif.), gives his interns copies of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged." Campbell told Steve Bensen, of the Washington Monthly that the response to President Obama's economic policies reminded him of what happened in the 51-year-old novel.” The achievers, the people who create all the things that benefit rest of us, are going on strike. I'm seeing, at a small level, a kind of protest from the people who create jobs, the people who create wealth, who are pulling back from their ambitions because they see how they'll be punished for them." Apparently, Rep Campbell knows some people that are “going Galt”
Have you seen someone with a t-shirt with the logo “Going Galt?” Galt is a protagonist and hero in Atlas Shrugged and he withdrew his productive endeavors from society, he didn’t cut back, he went on strike. How many movers and shakers have you seen that withdrew from business? Are there groups of people who are so heavily taxed that they simply withdraw? Show me the evidence.
Campbell sees these actions as a response by the wealthy, the worthy people in Rand’s mind, to the Obama plan to raise their taxes to the level of a 39.6% top rate, the same rate as we had under Clinton when there was a budget surplus and full employment. At the end of the Great Depression, under FDR, the top rate was around 80%. By president Reagan’s first term, it was 50%. Now, it’s 36% and the capital gains tax is a mere 15%. Capital gains is a large part of the income for the wealthiest Americans, just ask Warren Buffet who pays a lower percentage of his income as taxes than the average worker.
Ayn Rand on Religion
Ayn Rand in her own words
In the following texts, the words printed in italics are direct quotes from Ayn Rand. Rand promotes a philosophy of “rational self interest” and “objectivity” as a means of promoting the growth of civilization. Putting yourself first promotes economic efficiency. Any altruism or helping your neighbor has to be based on what is in it for me. This reasoning is behind many of the worst aspects of capitalism. Should I curb pollution now when the benefits go to future generations? Not if that means that I make less money now. Why should my taxes be used to feed the poor when all they are is a bunch of “parasites ?” If I see you being mugged, why should I get involved? I might get hurt and there is no profit in that at all. Welcome to “Objectivity,” and the philosophy of the right wing.
Study Ayn, the virtue of stupidity
Interview with Mike Wallace
Objectivism
This philosophy leads to nothing less than mass murder. When you deny food to someone that cannot support him or herself, you condemn that person to starvation, but what is in it for me? Democrats have just stopped the Republican spending bill that would cut the Women Infants and Children program, which offers food aid and educational support for low-income mothers and their children, by $868 million, a 13 percent cut from current spending. This Objectivist philosophy holds its own very well when compared to Nazism and the Final Solution, only the worthy survive. If you are unemployed, or handicapped, or otherwise deemed unworthy, you are a parasite , unworthy of any help. Most of us, or at least I hope most of us still support a mixed form of Capitalism which regulates the excesses of Capitalists and provides a safety net for any and all of us in times of need.
Followers
What is evil?
In the interview with Mike Wallace, Wallace asked, “You say you do not like the altruism with which we live” . . . “I would say I don’t like, is too weak a word, I consider it evil.”” You are out to destroy, almost every edifice of our contemporary American way of life, our Judeo-Christian religion, our modified, government regulated capitalism, our rule by the majority will, other reviews have said that you scorn churches and the concept of God, are these accurate criticisms?” “Uh yes!”
“Blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth”
“Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.”
Obviously Jesus had not read Ayn Rand, I wonder if He would have called the poor parasites, but, this is Conservative philosophy. Throw your Bible away and follow Ayn Rand and you too can be a true Conservative.
William Buckley
Objective Reality
Rand promoted a philosophy of “objective reality ” (her words) “reality exists in an objective reality” “man needs a rational morality”. “Man...has to hold reason as an absolute” “his highest moral purpose is the achievement of his own happiness” “Each man must live as an end in himself and follow his own rational self interest.” Wallace; “Christ, every other important moral leader in man’s history has taught us that we should love one another, why is this kind of love, in your mind, immoral?” “it is immoral if it is a love placed above oneself, it is more than immoral, it is impossible!” “You love only, those who deserve it. ” Wallace; “If a man is weak, or a woman is weak, then he is beyond love?” “He certainly does not deserve it” “If a man wants love he should correct his weaknesses” Wallace; “There are very few of us in this world, who by your standards are worthy of love?” “Unfortunately yes, but it is open to everybody, to make themselves worthy of it and that is all my morality offers them.”
From Ayn Rand’s Message to America, in her own words on Conservatives; “They are claiming that freedom, Capitalism and America are based on faith in God. Politically such a claim contradicts the fundamental principles of the United State, in America; religion is a private matter and must not be brought into political issues. Intellectually, to rest one’s case on faith is to concede that reason is on the side of one’s enemies” “The plea to preserve tradition, as such, appeals to the worst elements in man and rejects the best, it appeals to fear, cowardice, conservative self doubt, and rejects creativeness, originality, independence, self reliance.
Stephen Colbert
CommentsLoading...
The reactionary right need someone to justify their extremist policies and actions , with adolph , mao , stalin , etal dead and discredited.......Rand fortunately did not rise to the political heights where she could not only be dead , but completely discredited , until she is we have to endure the "fools on the hill" and off ..........
If jesus hadn't risen he'd be turning over in his grave , right now.......Considering all those that mislead while leading , following a rand type of philosophy , as more still knock on that objectivist door..........
I had noted the same thing and have pointed it out on a few occasions. In the current political climate with the president sporting rank Keynesianism, I think conservatives are picking up whatever intellectual weapons that work and are using them. Sure, Rand was an atheist and Orwell was a socialist, but conservatives tend to find both useful. Perhaps the same rationale might explain why Hillary Clinton drags religion out and promotes it from time to time. Consider it a blunt instrument. But perhaps the times call for a measure of pragmatism. The president is in way over his incompetent head and is sending the economy to the basement. Perhaps a measure of panic is in order. Grab the most convenient weapon and attack!
Great insights. Voted up.
Although Rand was a moron, you also cannot dismiss the impacts of Adam Smith and the Chicago School of Economics when it comes to horrific ideas that have aided and abetted the GOP and tea-baggers.
The reason Rand's most successful books espousing her philosophy were novels is due to the fact that in novels one can control the environmnet and the outcomes.
After all, the entire thing is fiction...
Great hub Chef.
If ever anything should be scary to people it's those in a leadership position follow such evil ideals. I agree with AKA Winston. What is really sad is that we're watching it all unfold right before our eye...in the name of God.
up/awesome
Aka Winston Rand is not a moron if anything she is fit she understand the simple concept of, To be or not to be.
Why should Atlas carried you http://shrugitatlas.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/45 Her concept was simple and just what if Atlas shrugged? can anyone answer her question.
Chefref -- I've got one word for this essay & your comments: Beautiful!!!
PrometheusKid -- If you want to read a sustained series of arguments aimed against Ayn Rand's Objectivism and libertarianism, go to my Hubpage and start reading all of the essays about individualism vs. egoism, Ron Paul, libertarianism, and Glenn Beck. Afterwards, if you'd like to quote scripture -- er, I mean "Atlas Shrugged" or "The Virtue of Selfishness" or anything else from Rand -- at me, I'll gladly respond point by point. But make absolutely certain you've read everything I've written on my Hubs about ethics and politics BEFORE doing so as I am fairly certain I will have answered many of your points ahead of time and short-circuited Rand's "principles" underlying her beliefs. Remember -- according to Ayn Rand, if you accept her premises, then you must accept her conclusions; so this works the other way around: if I can show any of her conclusions are absurd or any of her premises are irrational or mistaken, I am not bound to accept her philosophy at all. Nor is anyone else.
What if Atlas shrugged?
Simple and gets to the point. But the anti individual will see nothing.
PrometheusKid -- I'm not "anti-individual," I'm anti-egoist. And Atlas shrugged with it's 1,000+ pages is not simple, but it is simplistic; it could be boiled down to one sentence: Those who have much deserve every last bit of it, no luck or subterfuge is ever involved in acquisition of wealth, wealth is the whole point of existence and those with wealth and means have no responsibilities to anyone whatsoever if they don't feel like taking them on, and those who wind up poor, sick, discriminated against, or whatever, can go straight to Hell because they deserve it and the world will be better off the sooner they die and get out of the way. It's sheer materialism, egoism, and Social Darwinism, and for all the aggrandizement of the sacred ego, Rand and her followers never seem to care overmuch for actual living, breathing human beings. Unless they're rich. Or exist only in badly written, overly long romance novels.
She recognizes she has both a private life, a creative area of freedom and intelligence with its obligations, and an external life, with its obligations to recognize the inherent value of other human beings.
Amen
But the question still remains what if Atlas shrugged?
http://www.photohome.com/pictures/new-york-picture I want to ask Rockefellar but I dont think he would like me.
PrometheusKid -- I'll play, since you won't read my considerably fewer than 1,000 pages of essays.
"But the question still remains what if Atlas shrugged?"
The answer: There is no "Atlas" outside of fiction novels. And most of the great, creative people in history have been nothing like "Atlas."
Name a few people, real people, whom you believe to be "Atlas" and I'll talk about their shrugging.
Good hub...I always laugh a little watching the new conservative winds spout Atlas Shrugged, while claiming their Christianity....not recognizing that the two are diametrically opposed. Then again, it isn't the only blatant irony displayed by that group lately.
The problem with Ayn Rand is that she separates morality and politics. The founders maintained that liberty could only be maintained with a moral or a religious poeple. Her philosophy is as idealistic as that of the political left, both of which failure is inevitable.
Chefsref--
It is true that conservatives want to do away with social programs but they certainly don't want starving poeple in the streets. If possible why shouldn't we get rid of as many social programs as we can? They're bankrupting the country, they haven't proved effective, there creating a dependancy, and increasing the size of government thereby threaten our liberties. Once these government bureaucracies are created they take on a life of thier own. Why not instead try to reduce the size of government, which reduces taxes encourages private charities and increases wealth for everyone?
I think it is interesting to note here that Anton Lavey received much of his philospohy from Ayn Rand. After I finished the FH, which is a great book by the way, I recognized all of Anton Lavey's teachings in Roark's speech to the jury at his trial. It compelled me to look up if there is any strong correlation between the two writers, and it turns out I'm not the only one who notices this.
Hypocrisy is rampant in the USA.










![The 2012 Republican Presidential Primaries-Romney, Gingrich, Paul? - Poll Closed: Paul Wins Again! (5-15-2012) [115*-26] The 2012 Republican Presidential Primaries-Romney, Gingrich, Paul? - Poll Closed: Paul Wins Again! (5-15-2012) [115*-26]](http://s1.hubimg.com/u/5933600_50.jpg)



HSchneider Level 6 Commenter 11 months ago
Great Hub ChefsRef. Her philosophy is truly evil and her adherents take it as a religion. Yes she was an atheist but she has become an almost religious icon. Her philosophy basing actions on only maximizing one's own happiness is horrible. Any politicians that openly adhere to this should be shown to the public for what they are.